A former colleague reached out to me recently. Smart guy. Senior engineer, the kind who optimizes everything he touches at work. Before our first call was even 10 minutes in, he was already walking me through his routine. He trains for 1 hour, 6 days per week. He logs between 9,000 and 12,000 steps daily. He cooks at home. He avoids processed food. He uses single-ingredient whole foods for almost every meal.
By his own conservative account, he is 10 kilograms overweight. My read: closer to 15–20.
I let him finish. Then I asked 1 question.
"Walk me through the last meal you cooked from scratch."
What followed was a completely reasonable meal — lean protein, vegetables, whole grains. Cooked in a generous dollop of organic butter, because there is no harm in animal fat. A handful of nuts on the side because they come straight from nature. A drizzle of extra virgin olive oil over the vegetables because it is good fat. A glass of juice because it is from real fruit.
There it was.
He was not lying about eating clean. Every ingredient he named is objectively good food. But he was violating at least 10 of the 20 principles that determine whether your nutrition actually supports fat loss — or quietly works against it while you convince yourself you are doing everything right.
Clean eating and lean eating are not the same thing.
That distinction is what this article is about.
If you recognized yourself in that story — doing everything right on paper and still not moving — there is currently 1 spot open in Limitless 90, my 90-day VIP coaching program. Fully personalized. No templates, no generic plans. Just your body, your schedule, and a clear path to the physique and energy you have been working toward for longer than you should have had to.
Book a complimentary strategy call
The Problem Is Not What You Know. It Is How You Decide.
Most people reading this know roughly what they should eat. Protein matters. Vegetables are good. Ultra-processed food is bad. Sugar is the enemy. This is not secret knowledge. It is everywhere.
And yet the majority of people who eat "clean" by their own definition are still carrying more body fat than they want. Still starting over every spring. Still frustrated by the gap between the effort they put in and the body they get back.
The missing piece is not information. It is a decision layer.
Every day, you make dozens of small decisions about food. What to cook. What to add to it. What to order. What to buy at the supermarket. How much of something to use. Whether that ingredient is fine or not. Most of these decisions happen fast, on autopilot, based on a loose sense of what "healthy" looks like. And most of the time, that loose sense is wrong — not dramatically wrong, but consistently wrong in the same direction, by the same margin, every single day.
That adds up.
The people who stay lean year round are not more disciplined than you. They are not eating bland food while you eat the good stuff. They enjoy their meals just as much as anyone else. The difference is that they decided a long time ago which meals those would be — and they stopped renegotiating that decision every time they were hungry, tired, or standing in front of an open fridge at 8pm. The food did not change. The decision-making did.
How the Sharpest Minds Remove Decisions They Do Not Need to Make
Steve Jobs wore the same black turtleneck and blue jeans for decades. Not because he lacked options or opinions. Because he decided once that clothing was not a domain worth his cognitive bandwidth, and he removed it from his daily decision stack permanently.
Mark Zuckerberg does the same. So did Einstein. The reasoning is identical in every case: the human brain has a finite capacity for high-quality decision-making in any given day. Every trivial decision you make depletes a resource that should be going somewhere more important. The solution is not to try harder — it is to stop making those decisions altogether by pre-deciding them at the system level.
Tim Ferriss documented this principle in the domain of nutrition in The 4-Hour Body. He ate the same rotating set of slow-carb meals on repeat for months. Not because those were the only foods he enjoyed. Because he made the decision once about what his nutritional framework looked like, and then stopped negotiating with himself every time he was hungry. The result was predictable, repeatable fat loss without daily willpower expenditure.
Ray Dalio built Bridgewater — one of the largest hedge funds in the world — on a similar principle. He spent years codifying his decision-making logic into a written set of principles so that individual judgment and emotion would be removed from the equation at critical moments. The principles make the decision. You just execute. He documented this in his book Principles, which is required reading at Bridgewater and has been read by a significant portion of the senior tech and finance world.
The pattern is the same in every case. Identify the domain where repeated low-quality decisions are costing you. Codify the logic once. Let the framework decide from that point forward.
This is exactly what a lean nutrition framework does. And it is exactly what most people eating clean have never considered having.
Why Cookie-Cutter Solutions Fail
Before going further, let's be direct about the alternative approaches.
Keto works. Low-carb works. Intermittent fasting works. A dozen other named dietary frameworks work. They are not pseudoscience. Keto, for instance, is clinically validated — it has been used to treat epilepsy and type 2 diabetes with measurable results. The mechanism is real.
The problem is not whether these approaches work. The problem is whether they work for most people — and whether most people can implement them correctly without already having a sophisticated understanding of their own body, their training demands, and their nutritional baselines.
Keto done wrong is not a fat loss diet. It is a high-calorie diet with an identity. Fat is 9 calories per gram — more than double the calorie density of protein or carbohydrate. A person who switches to keto without understanding calorie density and portion dynamics will frequently end up consuming more total calories than before, while believing the opposite. The food is "clean." The result is not lean.
The same logic applies to every named diet that prescribes what to eat without teaching you how to think about what you are eating. A prescription can be copied, but it does not travel well. The moment your life changes — you are on a work trip, at a birthday dinner, in a country where half the prescribed foods are unavailable — the prescription breaks down and you are left improvising with no logic to fall back on. A decision framework, by contrast, works in any context, because it gives you the reasoning behind the choice rather than just the choice itself. You are not following a script. You are applying a principle. And principles work whether you are in your own kitchen, at a restaurant, or standing in front of a vending machine at an airport at midnight.
There is no single right way to eat for leanness. There are many right ways and many wrong implementations of each. What I am presenting here is my version — the framework I have developed and refined over 23+ years leading engineering teams inside high-pressure tech environments, combined with formal certification as an international personal trainer and nutrition adviser, and years of working directly with professionals who think in systems, have no patience for things that fall apart under real-world conditions, and do not have 2 hours a day to spend figuring out what to eat.
It is not the only valid framework. It is the one I have found to work for the widest range of people, with the most flexibility, and the fewest catastrophic failure points.
The Real Cost of Not Having a Framework
Without a decision framework, you are always one bad week away from starting over.
The pattern is predictable. You eat reasonably through the week. Friday arrives and something loosens. The weekend becomes a partial write-off. Monday you restart with renewed intention. By February you have been in this loop for 3 months and your body looks the same as it did in November. By May you start to panic. By August you have made some progress, but summer is already ending. By October you have relaxed again. By January you make the same resolution.
This is not weakness. This is what happens when your nutritional behaviour is governed entirely by motivation and willpower rather than a pre-decided operating system. Motivation fluctuates. A framework does not.
The yo-yo is not a character flaw. It is a systems design failure.
The senior tech professionals who stay lean year round have built a different system. They do not rely on motivation to make the right choice at 7pm on a Thursday when they are tired and hungry and the easiest option is in front of them. The choice is already made. The framework answers it.
The Framework: 20 Principles for Staying Lean Year Round
What follows is not a meal plan. There is no list of approved foods, no recipe templates, no calorie targets handed to you. This is a decision layer — 20 principles you apply when you are buying groceries, cooking, ordering food, or choosing between options. Run any decision through these, and the answer resolves itself.
Apply them repeatedly, and something interesting happens: the decisions stop being decisions. Your grocery list becomes predictable. Your go-to meals stop requiring negotiation. Your eating becomes pre-decided — not because someone told you what to eat, but because you have built your own version through repeated application of the same logic.
That is what mastery looks like.
The principles are organized into clusters based on what each one protects against.
Cluster 1: The Protein Foundation
These principles govern the most important nutritional variable for staying lean. Get these right and everything else becomes significantly easier.
Principle 1: Read nutrition labels — every time. The numbers on the back of a package are the fastest way to understand what you are actually consuming. Calories per 100g, protein content, fat content, added sugar. 4 numbers. Make reading them automatic for every new product until you have a calibrated internal reference. Most people have never done this consistently — which is exactly why most people cannot explain why they are not getting leaner.1
Principle 2: Measure everything — at least until your eye is calibrated. Buy a kitchen scale and install a calorie tracking app — MyNetDiary or any equivalent. The scale tells you exactly how much of something you have. The app tells you exactly what that amount costs you in calories and macronutrients. Both together are the only way to know what is actually going into your body, as opposed to what you estimate is going in. People consistently underestimate portions by 30–50%. A serving of olive oil, a portion of pasta, a handful of nuts — these all look dramatically different on a scale compared to what your hand tells you. Track and measure until you have built an accurate internal reference. For most people this takes 4 to 8 weeks. After that, the scale becomes optional — but your eye will never mislead you the same way again.2
Principle 3: Protein first — build every meal around a protein source. Protein preserves muscle during fat loss, keeps you fuller longer than carbohydrate or fat at the same calorie level, and burns more calories during digestion through its high thermic effect. Every meal starts with the protein source. Everything else fills in around it. Daily target: 1.6–2.2g per kg of bodyweight.3 4
Principle 4: Fat vs. protein — know which side your food is on. Look at the label. If a food has more grams of fat than grams of protein per 100g, it is a fat source, not a protein source. A common example: supermarket frozen meatballs. They look like a protein food. Read the label and you will typically find 15g of fat and 7–10g of protein per 100g — meaning more than half the calories are coming from fat, not protein. Many foods marketed as high-protein fail this test. This is a 5-second filter that eliminates the most common labelling traps at the supermarket.5
Principle 5: The protein equation — how to think about remaining calories. Before this principle can work, you need 1 number: your Total Daily Energy Expenditure — the actual number of calories your body burns in a day given your size, age, and activity level. Without it, any calorie target you set is a guess. Use the BMR and TDEE calculator to get your baseline. That number becomes your anchor. Once you know your daily calorie target and your protein target, the rest is simple arithmetic: subtract the calories coming from protein and everything remaining goes to fats and carbohydrates. Protein delivers 4 calories per gram, so if your target is 150g of protein, that accounts for 600 calories. If your daily target is 2,500, you have 1,900 calories left to allocate across fats and carbohydrates however you choose. This framing removes the complexity of strict macro tracking while keeping protein non-negotiable.6
Cluster 2: Fat Awareness
Fat is not the enemy. Unconscious fat consumption is.
Principle 6: The 10% fat rule. During a fat loss phase, foods with more than 10% fat content come off your main plate. Fat delivers 9 calories per gram — more than double the calorie density of protein or carbohydrate — and high-fat foods are the most common source of hidden calories in otherwise clean diets. This is not permanent and it is not fear of fat. It is a temporary filter that removes the most consistent leak in most people's calorie budget.7
Principle 7: Be smart with fat. Healthy fats are not a free pass. Nuts, nut butters, olive oil, avocado, fatty fish, full-fat dairy — these are genuinely nutritious foods that are also extremely easy to overconsume. 1 tablespoon of olive oil is approximately 120 calories. A handful of almonds is 160–200. Log these accurately or they will silently destroy your deficit.8
Principle 8: Low-fat cheese is underrated. If you need volume — on pizza, in a sandwich, in a sauce — low-fat cheese at 5–10% fat content delivers the flavour and function without the calorie load. Check the label, compare options, keep a few in rotation. This is a practical substitution that most people never consider because they assume the category is unavailable to them.9
Cluster 3: Calorie Management Without Obsession
Principle 9: Cheat meals are fine. Cheat days are not. 1 meal that goes over budget does not derail a week. 1 day that becomes 4 does. The all-or-nothing response — where 1 off-meal becomes a reason to write off the entire weekend — is what wrecks most people's progress. A cheat meal is a planned, deliberate exception. A cheat day is a systems failure. Know the difference and hold the line at the meal.10
Principle 10: Replace sugary liquid calories. Juice, regular soda, sweetened coffee drinks, energy drinks with sugar — these add calories without adding satiety. Liquid calories do not register the same way solid food does in your hunger signalling, which means you consume them on top of normal intake rather than instead of it. Replace with diet versions, sparkling water, or plain water. This single swap removes hundreds of calories from many people's daily intake without changing how full they feel.11 12
Principle 11: Guilt-free desserts — your sweet tooth is not the enemy. The goal is not to eliminate sweets. It is to replace mindless indulgence with intentional substitution. Start with whole fruit — apples, oranges, bananas — which deliver natural sugar alongside fibre, vitamins, and enough volume to satisfy a craving without meaningful calorie damage. Berries are the best option in this category: low in sugar, high in fibre, and available fresh in season or frozen year round, which makes them a practical choice in winter when fresh options are limited. From there, move into options that also serve your protein target: high-protein yogurt, protein puddings, and protein bars with no added sugar and at least 30% protein content. These satisfy the craving and contribute to your daily protein total at the same time. Use any or all of these daily if needed. There is no reason to white-knuckle through a craving when better options are sitting in your fridge.13
Principle 12: Alcohol — know what you are trading. A gram of alcohol delivers 7 calories — more than protein or carbohydrate, with zero nutritional value. Beyond calories, your body treats alcohol as a toxin and prioritises metabolising it above everything else, which means fat oxidation stops completely while you drink. It also disrupts sleep architecture, suppresses recovery, and increases food cravings in the hours after. During an active fat loss phase, minimise alcohol as much as possible. When you do drink, choose dry wine or spirits with sugar-free mixers, alternate with water, and account for the calories.14 15
Cluster 4: Hunger and Timing
Principle 13: Stop eating 3 hours before bed. When you eat close to bedtime, your body digests food during the hours it should be prioritising recovery and hormonal repair. Late eating also disrupts sleep quality, and poor sleep directly affects hunger hormones the following day — increasing ghrelin, which drives appetite, and reducing leptin, which signals fullness. Set a hard cutoff. The kitchen closes 3 hours before you sleep.16 17
Principle 14: Train your hunger hormones — eat at consistent times. Ghrelin operates on a circadian rhythm. When you eat at consistent times every day, your body learns to anticipate food and calibrates its hunger signals accordingly. Irregular eating times produce irregular hunger signals, which produce random cravings that feel impossible to manage. Eating consistently is not about rigidity. It is about making hunger predictable so you choose from a position of control rather than react to a craving.18
Principle 15: Use sparkling mineral water as a satiety tool. Sparkling water before and between meals creates a mild sense of fullness through volume and carbonation without adding any calories. If you are in a calorie deficit and hunger is a recurring problem, this is one of the simplest tools available. Keep it cold, keep it accessible, reach for it first when the gap between meals feels long.19
Principle 16: Stay hydrated — thirst disguises itself as hunger. When you feel hungry between meals, drink a large glass of water first and wait 10–15 minutes before deciding whether to eat. Your brain processes thirst and hunger signals in the same hypothalamic region, and mild dehydration reliably produces what feels like hunger — because the body anticipates that eating will bring in liquid. Most of the time, the hunger dissolves once you are hydrated.20
Principle 17: Wait 20 minutes before going back for seconds. Satiety hormones — leptin, GLP-1, CCK — take approximately 20 minutes to travel from your gut to your brain after you have eaten. If you finish a meal and still feel hungry, that feeling is not yet reliable information. Wait 20 minutes, stay busy, then reassess. Most of the time the hunger resolves on its own.21
Cluster 5: Lifestyle Integration
These principles are not about food. They are about the context in which food decisions happen — and they have an outsized effect on every other principle in this list.
Principle 18: Walk after meals. 10–15 minutes of walking after eating blunts the post-meal blood glucose spike, improves insulin sensitivity, and supports digestion. Chronically high post-meal glucose spikes drive fat storage and hunger dysregulation over time. A short walk costs nothing, requires no equipment, and stacks onto a habit you already have.22 23
Principle 19: Eat whole, single-ingredient foods 80–90% of the time. If a food has 1 ingredient — chicken, eggs, oats, rice, broccoli, fish — it belongs in this category. These foods make hitting protein and fibre targets easy while naturally limiting calorie density. The remaining 10–20% can be anything. This is not a cheat. It is a built-in sustainability mechanism. An approach that allows nothing eventually allows everything at once. An approach that allows 10–20% flexibility survives real life.24
Principle 20: No screens while eating. Eating in front of a phone or screen splits your attention between food and content, which disrupts normal satiety signalling. When eating is the only thing you are doing, you chew more thoroughly, eat more slowly, and register fullness more accurately. When you are also watching something, you eat faster and consistently consume more before the fullness signal arrives. Make meals a screen-free activity. It requires no effort and produces a measurable reduction in mindless overconsumption.25
How the Decisions Disappear
Here is what happens when you apply these principles consistently.
The first week, you are thinking about all 20. It feels like a lot. You are reading labels you never noticed before, measuring things you used to eyeball, making substitutions that feel deliberate.
By week 4, about half of these have become automatic. You reach for sparkling water without thinking about it. You build meals around protein without having to remind yourself. You check the fat-to-protein ratio at the supermarket before anything else goes in the basket.
By month 3, your entire nutritional routine is largely pre-decided. Not because someone handed you a rigid meal plan. Because you have run enough decisions through the same filter that the decisions are no longer open questions. Your go-to meals are established. Your substitutions are automatic. Your grocery list writes itself.
This is what staying lean year round actually looks like from the inside. Not constant vigilance. Not white-knuckling through cravings. A set of decisions made once, at the framework level, that answer themselves every time you are standing in front of a fridge at 7pm on a Thursday.
The framework does not replace your judgment. It makes your judgment faster, more consistent, and less dependent on how tired or motivated you happen to feel that day.
The full framework — all 20 principles on a single page — is available as a free PDF: The Everlean Code. Print it and stick it on your fridge. That is where it does its best work. Not in your head. On the wall, in front of you, every time you open the fridge.
A Note on Other Approaches
Keto, intermittent fasting, low-carb, time-restricted eating, carb cycling — all of these are scientifically legitimate approaches to fat loss. They are not fads. They have peer-reviewed research behind them, real-world results, and genuine mechanisms that explain why they work. None of them belong in the pseudoscience bin.
The problem is not whether they work. The problem is that every named approach solves part of the nutrition puzzle and leaves the rest to willpower, luck, or a level of nutritional literacy that most people starting out simply do not have yet. The moment life gets complicated — a work trip, a dinner out, a week of poor sleep — the prescription breaks and there is nothing underneath it to fall back on.
Intermittent fasting is a good example of how this plays out in practice. The core idea — compressing your eating into a defined daily window, most commonly 16 hours fasting and 8 hours eating — is legitimate and works for many people. The mechanism is real: a shorter eating window naturally limits the total number of opportunities to consume calories, which for many people produces a calorie deficit without any deliberate tracking.
The failure mode, however, is equally common. A person who fasts for 16 hours and then eats freely for 8 will frequently overconsume during the eating window — especially if they are hungry, tired, or making food decisions without a framework to guide them. The deficit they created by skipping breakfast disappears by 9pm. The scale does not move. They conclude that intermittent fasting does not work for them, when the actual problem is that fasting is a timing strategy, not a nutrition strategy. It controls when you eat. It does not control what or how much.
This is true of most named approaches. They solve part of the problem and leave the rest to willpower or luck. The 20 principles in this article are compatible with intermittent fasting, with keto, with low-carb, or with no named approach at all — because they operate at the level of individual food decisions, not meal timing or macronutrient ratios. Layer them onto whatever structure suits your life and they will make it more effective. Apply them without any named structure and they will still get you where you want to go.
There is no single right way to eat for leanness. There are many right ways. This is one of them — and in my experience, it is the one that works for the widest range of people without requiring them to overhaul their entire relationship with food on day 1.
The Only Sustainable Answer
There is no fast way to stay lean permanently.
There is a slow way that works: educate yourself on the principles that govern whether your nutritional choices support or contradict your goal, apply those principles until they become automatic, and arrive at a physique that took months — not weeks — to build, which means it will take months to lose if life ever derails you, not days.
That slow way is also the permanent way. The people who yo-yo are the people who found a faster approach that worked for 6 weeks. The people who stay lean year round built a decision framework and let it run their nutrition while they focused on everything else.
The framework I have built for my clients — and that the former colleague described at the beginning of this article is now using — is available as a free standalone document: The Everlean Code. 20 principles with the reasoning behind each one, organized to be applied immediately.
If the gap between your current eating and your current results has been frustrating you, this is where to start.
Prefer to do this with someone in your corner rather than figuring it out alone?
Ivan Aseev
Performance Engineer for Tech Leaders
There is currently 1 spot open in Limitless 90 — 90 days of fully personalized coaching built around your schedule, your body, and your goals. No templates. No generic programs. The same approach I used with the former colleague in this article.
Book a Strategy CallReferences
Footnotes
-
Hebden, L., et al. (2015). "Consumer understanding of food labels and their use in food selection." Public Health Nutrition, 18(16), 2882–2891. ↩
-
Dhurandhar, E.J., et al. (2015). "The effectiveness of breakfast recommendations on weight loss: a randomized controlled trial." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(2), 507–513. ↩
-
Leidy, H.J., et al. (2015). "The role of protein in weight loss and maintenance." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 101(6), 1320S–1329S. ↩
-
Stokes, T., et al. (2018). "Recent perspectives regarding the role of dietary protein for the promotion of muscle hypertrophy with resistance exercise training." Nutrients, 10(2), 180. ↩
-
Hall, K.D., et al. (2019). "Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain." Cell Metabolism, 30(1), 67–77. ↩
-
Helms, E.R., et al. (2014). "Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation." Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), 20. ↩
-
Astrup, A., et al. (2019). "Dietary fat and cardiometabolic health: evidence, controversies, and consensus for guidance." BMJ, 366, l4978. ↩
-
Mattes, R.D., & Dreher, M.L. (2010). "Nuts and healthy body weight maintenance mechanisms." Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 19(1), 137–141. ↩
-
Thorning, T.K., et al. (2016). "Milk and dairy products: good or bad for human health? An assessment of the totality of scientific evidence." Food & Nutrition Research, 60, 32527. ↩
-
Polivy, J., & Herman, C.P. (1985). "Dieting and binging: A causal analysis." American Psychologist, 40(2), 193–201. ↩
-
Pan, A., & Hu, F.B. (2011). "Effects of carbohydrates on satiety: differences between liquid and solid food." Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, 14(4), 385–390. ↩
-
Mattes, R.D. (1996). "Dietary compensation by humans for supplemental energy provided as ethanol or carbohydrate in fluids." Physiology & Behavior, 59(1), 179–187. ↩
-
Paddon-Jones, D., et al. (2008). "Protein, weight management, and satiety." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87(5), 1558S–1561S. ↩
-
Suter, P.M., Schutz, Y., & Jequier, E. (1992). "The effect of ethanol on fat storage in healthy subjects." New England Journal of Medicine, 326(15), 983–987. ↩
-
Ebrahim, I.O., et al. (2013). "Alcohol and sleep I: effects on normal sleep." Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 37(4), 539–549. ↩
-
Arble, D.M., et al. (2009). "Circadian timing of food intake contributes to weight gain." Obesity, 17(11), 2100–2102. ↩
-
Spiegel, K., Tasali, E., Penev, P., & Van Cauter, E. (2004). "Brief communication: sleep curtailment in healthy young men is associated with decreased leptin levels, elevated ghrelin levels, and increased hunger and appetite." Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(11), 846–850. ↩
-
Jakubowicz, D., et al. (2013). "High caloric intake at breakfast vs. dinner differentially influences weight loss of overweight and obese women." Obesity, 21(12), 2504–2512. ↩
-
Cuomo, R., et al. (2002). "Effects of carbonated water on functional dyspepsia and constipation." European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14(9), 991–999. ↩
-
Mattes, R.D., & Campbell, W.W. (2009). "Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults who are overweight or obese." Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(3), 430–437. ↩
-
Degen, L., et al. (2005). "Effect of peptide YY3–36 on food intake in humans." Gastroenterology, 129(5), 1430–1436. ↩
-
DiPietro, L., et al. (2013). "Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improves 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance." Diabetes Care, 36(10), 3262–3268. ↩
-
Colberg, S.R., et al. (2009). "Postprandial walking is better for lowering the glycemic effect of dinner than pre-dinner exercise in type 2 diabetic individuals." Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(6), 394–397. ↩
-
Monteiro, C.A., et al. (2018). "The UN decade of nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing." Public Health Nutrition, 21(1), 5–17. ↩
-
Ogden, J., Coop, N., Cousins, C., et al. (2013). "Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless eating." Appetite, 62, 119–126. ↩